Wednesday, February 14, 2007

Google Loses Copyright Case Involving Belgian Newspapers

How Belgian newspapers fought to get Google to stop (free) archiving of Belgian newspapers’ pay-per-view contents …(unprecedented)?




Google Loses Copyright Case Involving Belgian Newspapers

February 14, 2007
By AOIFE WHITE, Associated Press


BRUSSELS, Belgium -- Google Inc. lost a copyright lawsuit Tuesday to Belgian newspapers that had demanded it remove headlines and links to articles posted on its news site without their permission.

The ruling, if it stands on appeal, could set a precedent for how Web search engines link to copyrighted material in the tumultuous arena of online news, according to the Belgian copyright group that launched the case.






Google said it would appeal, arguing that its Google News service was "entirely legal" and that the Belgian ruling did not set any precedent.

The Brussels Court of First Instance ruled that Mountain View, Calif.-based Google could not rely on exemptions, such as asserting "fair use," because it says it reviews press articles when it displays headlines, a few lines of text, photos and links to the original page.

"Google is reproducing and publishing works protected by copyright," it said. "Google cannot call on any exceptions set out by law relating to copyright or similar rights."

It decided in favor of Copiepresse, a copyright protection group representing 17 mostly French-language newspapers that complained the search engine's "cached" links offered free access to archived articles that the papers usually sell.

Copiepresse said the ruling was based on EU law and could trigger similar cases against Google in other nations, saying it had been in touch with copyright groups in Norway, Austria and Italy.

But Google said the judgment - which confirms an initial ruling in September - would not necessarily carry influence in other areas.

"This ruling does not mean that everywhere else or every other judge in any other country would rule the same, even in Belgium," said Yoram Elkaim, legal counsel for Google News.

U.S.-based technology lawyer Jonathan Band said the ruling was neither final - as it can be appealed in Belgium - nor did it bear much weight because legal precedent is not as important in Continental European law.

Google said the court still had not settled the debate about what the ruling covered, arguing that it only applied to Google News Belgium and

"In our view, we have complied with the ruling fully since September," Elkaim said.

If the court agrees, Google would not have to pay retroactive daily fines of more than $32,000 for each day that Google did not comply - far lower than an earlier judgment that threatened $1.3 million a day.

But Copiepresse lawyer Bernard Magrez said Google was still not complying fully with the ruling - saying it covered and other versions. If the court agrees, fines could run as high as $4.3 million.

Copiepresse is still negotiating similar copyright issues with Yahoo Inc. and Microsoft's MSN.

The group's secretary general, Margaret Boribon, said all companies that republish copyrighted works need to seek permission and pay compensation.

"Content made available by editors is quality content that is very expensive to produce, and which has value ... and that value should be recognized," she said.

Elkaim, however, ruled out paying to display content - Copiepresse's key demand - but said Google was willing to discuss terms with the Belgian newspapers.

"It shouldn't preclude us from continuing to collaborate with news publishers who generally ... do want their content to be searchable so that more people can find their content on their website," he said.

"The vast majority of publishers are happy to be included in Google News, and actually we receive more complaints from publishers that are not included."

In the future, the court said it would be up to copyright owners to get in touch with Google to complain if the site was posting content that belonged to them.

Google would then have 24 hours to withdraw the content or face a daily fine of $1,295.


No comments: